This is a guest post by Bryan Hollis, owner of Mid-Carolina Freelance, LLC, the umbrella company that owns Affiliate Manager Pro, Linux Hosting Only which hosts GrowMap.com and Sandlapper Web Design. Bryan also owns the blogging community BlogInteract.
Fear. There is no doubt that this – in it’s simplest form – is what Google is instilling in millions of webmasters, bloggers, SEO Agents, and online marketers in general that are in a constant battle to please the search engine giant.
It’s no secret that the giant snowball started roughly 2 years ago when the first Panda release to combat various forms of spam and duplicate content was released. At the time, this was taken fairly well by those that followed “the rules” – didn’t comment spam, link farm, or submit spun articles all across the web. Then things got worse – much worse.
I have been providing SEO services for some time now and pleasing Google was always goal number one. The “lesser” search engines had a degree of importance, but satisfying Google was certainly the number one priority.
As the title includes the word “fallacies”, the list is rather long in just how Google is increasingly becoming the inferior search engine on the web. I’ll try not to go all over the map in this post. The fact is, it could really be broken into possibly three posts, depending on just how much you can take at one time.
I’ll start with linking and the fear involved – the “false” fear
over Google that has recently had site owners consumed.
Over the course of many years, my company Mid Carolina Freelance, LLC developed well over two dozen sites or so. These sites – for the most part – are still going today and still serving the purpose for which they were established. Each of these sites were formed for a specific purpose. Some were article marketing sites, some blogs.
Their core purpose was to provide a place that my company could post original content on behalf of our clients. Other writers were welcome. We certainly didn’t want lop-sided sites that real readers questioned. They needed to have standards of course. All this said, these websites have worked hard and have all served their purpose. They still do today.
Recently I have been inundated with email after email asking me to remove this link here and that link there. Some are almost a year old. At first I asked, even though their email explicitly detailed the reason. And at first I asked (in the most respectful of ways) if they were kidding.
“No, please remove them ASAP. We are trying to avoid
Google penalties.” I laughed in silence.
Here these webmasters and SEO Agents have spent hundreds – if not thousands – of dollars building links through articles or whatever and now they want to spend the same or more reversing their work. Insanity is what I call it. What I wonder – with all due respect – is whether or not they are testing Google. Are you reading a post like this and reacting? Is it something you heard through the grapevine? Whatever instigated it, it is like a false scare from the CDC or some international epidemic.
Let’s look at Google’s blunders over the last six or so months – then decide for yourself if it’s time to push back. Google is becoming infamous for giving you the results they want you to see, but the truth is like a JFK conspiracy theory.
It is no real secret that Google suffered a pretty significant loss in the third quarter of 2012. However, if you Google “Google 3rd quarter earnings report 2012″, the first search result is – you guessed it – Google’s own investor link. Here is a quote regarding the report:
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – October 18, 2012 – Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) today announced financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
“We had a strong quarter. Revenue was up 45 percent year-on-year, and, at just fourteen years old, we cleared our first $14 billion revenue quarter,” said Larry Page, CEO of Google. “I am also really excited about the progress we’re making creating a beautifully simple, intuitive Google experience across all devices.”
And directly below their search are entirely different, yet very consistent results. CNN Money reported an 8% drop in stock prices and what they called the 3rd quarter earnings “grim”. Forbes’ headline chose to use Google’s “Big Miss on Profit”. Each of the latter were inline with an 8% drop. Why the discrepancy? Moving right along.
Before I go howling at the moon or rambling, I do my due diligence first. Has been my historical approach to SEO, if I am “testing” I always use my own sites first – never a client’s. About four months ago, I launched my new web design and SEO site to consolidate.
After the site indexed in its entirety, it was on page one for several of the keywords I had chosen. I have come to the conclusion that focusing on your local market is wiser than the whole world. Even good ol” fashioned word-of-mouth gets me more work than a page one position.
With my new Google page one serp, I decided to play with some old methods on purpose, without concern or care about Google’s reaction. Hard and fast link building, blog posts linking in, you name it.
Three days later, I wasn’t even ten pages deep. Gone.
I visited Yahoo!, Bing, and AOL.com. Position held with these guys.
What did I do? Nothing. I left it alone.
One week…two weeks…ahh, there we are. I was back. Another week. Page 6. One more week, pages 2 – 4. Hmmm….
So let’s talk about algorithm problems. Google has everyone jumping in fear, yet their own algorithms are simply horrendous. Skewed. Out-of-whack. They want to prevent spam, yet they spam their own site. What content do they spam the most? Their own. The best example I can give is YouTube (Google’s video search engine).
So, here we go. I do a keyword search for my web design site. “Web Design Columbia SC”. Page one, position two is an ancient YouTube video. No problem. It’s still relevant. The web design firm still exists. That’s cool. On to page two. Position one – same EXACT YouTube link, excerpt, etc.
Duplicate content on their own website. Shame Google. Hypocrisy.
I realize now that there really should be a two part series to this post, so I am going to shift gears to make my initial point – pushing back. We all know the old saying about voting for your candidate. Some refuse with the idea that a single vote doesn’t matter. It does matter. If millions of people can choose the candidate they feel should run their country, then the same can be done with search engines.
Know in advance that I have no allegiance to Bill Gates or Microsoft, but it just so happens that Bing is steadily becoming a stronger search engine with each passing day. Do they have work to do? Yes. Do they need support from you? Yes. Until I write part 2, I encourage you to read a post about how Bing is starting to outpace Google.
It’s time to push back at Google. The only way to do this is to let them know that they are not the only search engine out there. Let their stock continue to plummet. Let their users migrate elsewhere. This is the only way to get them – or anyone – to take notice that you can’t push those around that made you who you are.
Image credits: David Noel – aoi.com.au








{ 93 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
Next Comments →
I would be very happy to see Google replaced at the top spot by Bing but I do think that we are a long way from this right now, If Bing and Google split the volume of traffic, many would simply buy ads on both and probably end up spending more. Good post, thanks for sharing.
thanks for showing the real face of google. how can be it so partial just to promote their own things or to give benefits to their clients who pay it big money. this is really not ethical business strategy. really so cheap thing of google.
Jessie B would love you to read ..Hot Actress Huma Qureshi – Movies List & Biography
I couldn’t agree more! I have been building my site for over two years trying to explain the truth behind some of the tv and internet “money making” companies and Google was fine taking my money for ads until I started moving up on Yahoo and Bing, and others. Then, when Google decided my dollar wasn’t worthy, I seemed to be beyond the 10 page mark as well. a month or so later, I’m on page 10. Then page 7, then 9, then 2, and now missing again. Thanks for the article – and the insight!
Your post s a real eye opener. Even though we all have sensed this degradation of Google, t is articles like these that warn the general user and push them to move to better service providers. thanks.
Patrik would love you to read ..How to Make Long Distance Relationships Work
There is a presence of a large number of search engines, but they are not as popular as Google. Therefore Google is acting like a jewel in the crown. Thanks for providing this knowledgeable share.
Twitter: brphollis
November 23, 2012 at 1:35 pm
Hi Aayna,
Thanks for visiting GrowMap and reading this post. You are correct. “Crown Jewel” is quite appropriate. As a community of webmasters, bloggers, or site owners, the only way to make change is to change our own routines. Businesses of any size will stumble and fall, or stop acting as if they own the world when they have no more clients!
Bryan
Bryan P. Hollis would love you to read ..Innovative CSS3 Custom Web Designs
Do you really believe that there will be another search engine, that will be able to change Google? I have many doubts about it, really)
Julia Spencer’s recent post.. Amazing Design Resources Collection: Especially for Christmas 2013
Hey Julia,
Yes, I do think it could happen. Any company who thinks they are bullet proof is mistaken. AOL seemed invincible. Netscape was hugely popular. MySpace at one time was poised for social dominance.
The population can be fickle. Google is 100% vulnerable to its users. They have an amazing brand to be sure. But, that can vanish very quickly. It’s not like running a search engine is a rocket science these days. They came out of the gates with a superior product, but are now compromising on their founding principles, in my view. The YouTube displays in the serps is an excellent example. Google owns YouTube so they want to send traffic to it. Why not restrict videos to YouTube searches? Or at the bottom of the serps?
I digress. My main point is that Google is vulnerable just as any business is. It would only take some features on CNN, the Today Show, GMA, and network news where Google searches are discussed as inferior and that could be the beginning of a huge migration.
These media giants discuss technology more and more because it’s a big part of our culture. It could happen. Google really needs to get its algo consistent again and clean up the serps. They are bordering on junk for many searches.
As an example, I’m into fitness. I like reading about building muscle, etc. There are some amazing blogs out there with content that LiveStrong, Muscle and Strength, Men’s Health and BodyBuilding.com doesn’t even come close to. Those are great sites, but they don’t deserve to take up all the spots on the first 3 pages for “muscle-related” searches. Yes, they are the authority sites, but they aren’t necessarily the best.
It’s the classic authority vs. relevancy issue and Google has swayed too far in placing too much weight on authority.
Jon would love you to read ..How I Generated 4,000 Website Visitors with 28 Press Releases in 45 Days
I’ve been using Bing more and more in recent months. Not because I want to push back, but because the search results with Google are terrible. As a user I don’t get what I want. Bing delivers quite nicely far more often.
Google still reigns supreme, but it only takes a slight shift in the critical mass to another search engine (likely Bing) to decimate Google. Once trust in Google’s performance is gone, they are vulnerable to an incredible loss in revenue. The reason Adwords is so profitable is because of their search engine. That’s it. If Bing manages to attract 50 percent of searches, the cost for Adwords cpc will plummet exponentially. We pay more for Adwords because it literally is an unlimited source of targeted traffic. When that’s no longer the case, using the 50% example above, the cost per click won’t decrease on average 50%, but instead much, much more.
I’m not one to spout anger at Google. If their panda and penguin truly resulted in better searches, so be it. BUT, it didn’t. Not by a long shot. I’ve seen at the local level pages 2 and 3 taken up by the same website … pages that are empty, when before penguin, pages 2 and 3 would list real options for users.
If search results continue as-is, I foresee a slow migration to Bing … but at some point it will be a mass-migration. Just as Google shot to #1 quickly once it hit a critical mass, it can drop equally quickly.
The bulk of their profits stem from their search engine. It’s their revenue and brand.
Twitter: GrowMap
November 21, 2012 at 2:48 pm
Hi Jon,
If Bing and Google split the volume of traffic, many would simply buy ads on both and probably end up spending more (because prices probably would not drop in half – as they decreased there would be more demand).
The problem with Google that users do not understand is you have no idea what they are NOT showing you or how many quality small businesses their churning search results are destroying every day. Users rarely notice what is NOT there – only what IS there.
GrowMap would love you to read ..Why Your Geographic Location is Your BEST Niche
Hey GrowMap,
Right now Bing’s cpc is a fraction of Adwords and that’s because they don’t deliver nearly the targeted traffic or the volume of traffic that Adwords can. I use both currently. Bing only works well for keywords with high search volume.
I agree, if Bing and Adwords each had 50% of the market, most businesses using Adwords would also use Bing (if they aren’t already). Budgets remain stable so I suspect the competition for Adwords would decrease lowering the cpc; however, Bing’s cpc would increase.
I obviously have no empirical data to support my theory that the cpc for Adwords would decrease exponentially, but I suspect it would to some degree if Bing ended up with 50% of the market. Adwords is the only real game in town for many businesses and they’ll pay a premium to tap into Google’s traffic. Once that traffic volume is compromised and targeting is not as acute as it is now, businesses simply won’t pay a premium. Besides they won’t have to because bidding competition will decrease.
You make a great point that searchers have no idea about what Google is NOT showing. That’s the difficulty. However, if Bing continues with its BingItOn campaign and more and more people try Bing and perhaps like it, a shift COULD occur. Right now most users blindly trust Google, but it only takes more publicity and media coverage to change that. I’m not saying it will happen. I’m saying it could happen.
Searchers aren’t stupid. When we keep getting bombarded with 3, 4 or 5 YouTube videos on a search results pages, we get annoyed. When Amazon takes up the top 5 spots, we get annoyed (I love Amazon, but 1 spot is sufficient). When we see the same 5 to 8 websites on the first 3 pages with multiple entries, we get annoyed. It all adds up to a poor user experience.
I appreciate Google wants to feature authoritative brand names. But, they don’t need to give the first 30 to 40 spots to a few sites. That’s what is happening. If someone doesn’t want LiveStrong the first time, they don’t want it the 5th time.
Jon would love you to read ..How I Generated 4,000 Website Visitors with 28 Press Releases in 45 Days
Twitter: GrowMap
November 25, 2012 at 9:39 am
Hi Jon,
I agree with you that if there were other sites where advertisers could buy targeted traffic that converts, demand could go down at Google and that could cause a decrease in prices. It is also possible that some advertisers would buy all the converting traffic available because it was profitable to do so.
What many people do not realize is that if you raise your budget at Google to buy more converting traffic than is available your conversion rates go down because they are perfectly happy to give you poor quality or untargeted traffic. They also periodically do that to increase their profits or any time there is more demand than searches available.
Something else few realize is that Google has admitted setting artificial bids. In the early days of AdWords they emphasized that you only have to pay more than your competitors, but later they admitted that was no longer true and now they might just set the bids during the holidays to any amount they believe they can get.
They also refuse to show your ads for keyword phrases that may be important to you, but that have low volume no matter how high you bid. They won’t tell you that. You will see the quality score message or be told your bids are too low or some other nonsense. One holiday season I bid $20 a click for the phrase chocolate pecan pie just to see if the ad would ever show up. It didn’t. And obviously you could not make a profit paying that much. I only did that to prove that bidding more made no difference at all.
If “Bing only works well for keywords with high search volume” it is because they don’t have enough traffic to sell you as many clicks as you would like to buy.
Google has a monopoly because they have almost all of the traffic that converts – and nothing converts as well as real search traffic.
GrowMap would love you to read ..Local Food Idea a Finalist in $100,000 Program: What you can learn from this idea to grow your business
ive been trying and trying to get better results from bing.
I rank well for lots of things, but noone uses bing, so i get less than 10% of my traffic from them
I get more from stumbleupon and I dont do anything to get that traffic

jonathansblog would love you to read ..Blue note – a story of modern jazz
Twitter: http://www.sanjaykhemlani.com/
November 21, 2012 at 5:39 am
I know the feeling Bryan, some folks at forums said they rank some test site without doing any links. Just articles, while some couldn’t rank at all. SEO definitely changed, and still changing fast. It was also announced that another Google update are coming within 5-7 days, let’s hope that our strategy are better this time.
sanjay would love you to read ..Comment on Collection of High PR Commentluv Blogs by Shyxter
Twitter: brphollis
December 1, 2012 at 2:05 am
Hi Sanjay,
Let’s hope, and thanks for the bit of information. I didn’t know they were going to dabble with things again. Really time to steer clear of these guys for just a bit until they get things straightened out. Thanks for reading,
Bryan
Hey Brian, good information to think about.
I think it’s good for everyone, Google included, that Bing is stepping up as a formidable competitor – although they have a ways to go.
Google needs more competition so they remember how to treat the hands that feed it.
Glen would love you to read ..Using The Law of Familiarity To Boost Credibility & Profits
Twitter: brphollis
December 1, 2012 at 2:06 am
You said it in a nut shell Glen, Bryan
Twitter: cheaperaccounts
November 21, 2012 at 2:29 am
I would be very happy to see Google replaced at the top spot by Bing but I do think that we are a long way from this right now. So sadly I still find myself jumping through the Google hoops as this is where my customers find me.
Emma Simpson would love you to read ..When is an Accountant not an Accountant?
I think the balance of power does need to shift a bit as at the moment Google have far too much of it and unfortunately most of us rely on them too much for traffic and therefore business at the moment.
In 2010 Google was the second brand of the world whereas Apple was declared the first brand of the world. Google is lossing its monolopy because of its regular updates in algorithm.Bing is becoming popular slowly.
Maja would love you to read ..Massage at Hair Salons
Twitter: AnaTrafficCafe
November 20, 2012 at 10:28 am
Their playground – their rules.
I understand many of us are dependent on Google traffic or at least want some, but blaming Google for watching out for their bottom line is silly.
I am with you, Bryan – panicking is not the right way to go, whatever the next update might be.
Ana Hoffman would love you to read ..Online Marketing Tools: Hot Black Friday Sales
Twitter: GrowMap
November 21, 2012 at 11:33 am
Hi Ana,
Look at the bigger picture. The wealthy few control everything, made Google what it is using major media, and ensured they would win by barely even trying to compete. That handed Google a monopoly. (Easier to track everyone using one, but rest assured all the others they control WILL be integrated into one database eventually.)
The game is fixed and it is getting harder and harder to escape. The end goal is to eliminate any ability to make an independent living or run a small business so that everyone must be a slave to corporate control.
Money has corrupted everything, especially any agency whose intended purpose was to protect the public. Laws, fees, taxes, licenses – all intended to make it harder to start a business or employ others.
Google is not “watching their bottom line” they are evil, pure and simple. Their CEO clearly stated his intention was to “clean up” the Internet “cesspool” by favoring big brands. Every update hands their corporate buddies more keyword phrases that convert and hurts small businesses, affiliate marketers and bloggers.
The longer people keep playing their game that we can never win, the harder it will be to create alternatives and connect with others who want to maintain their independence and work for themselves.
We have to do that NOW while we still have the Internet. SOPA, PIPA, CISPA, DMCA – all of these are attempts to eliminate blogs and small businesses online. Google will use Chrome block data, disavow links data, bounce rates, and page load times to start removing us from their index.
CyberSecurity is the excuse being used to take down content and as businesses automate that process it will affect increasing numbers of sites. One DMCA request by itself took down 1.5 million .edu teacher and student blogs. This is already a massive problem with innocent sites being taken down:
That issue will multiply. We have to open our eyes and build independent alternatives and collaborate while we still have Internet access to do it. I wrote about that in depth at http://www.dirjournal.com/business-journal/cybersecurity/. We have to work together to increase visibility instead of competing while corporations literally take over the world.
GrowMap would love you to read ..Why Your Geographic Location is Your BEST Niche
working in SEO for google, makes you a slave.
True, Google is not the only search engine out there. Unfortunately, it is the only one who brings me organic traffic.
Cristian Stan would love you to read ..Steam Mop Reviews
this i s very true i mean Google is like the government online but you must follow the rules because the internet is where most work at home jobs will be…thanks fof this article
Tanisha Ajokatcher would love you to read ..Twinkies and Wonder Bread Out Of Business
Could that be the rumblings of change I hear? If it’s Google, Bing, Yahoo or whatever is up next, I just hope that none totally takes over to the point where we can’t push back. It seems like this is less of a Google problem and more of a monopoly problem.
Robert Koenig would love you to read ..Musical Roads to Prevent Accidents?
Twitter: GrowMap
November 19, 2012 at 4:19 pm
Hi Robert,
A monopoly problem IS the real issue and IMHO any publicly traded company can be controlled by the wealthiest individuals so it only makes a little difference whether you use Google, Bing or Yahoo or any other corporation-owned solution because they will all be integrated with each other (may already be) and will continue to merge most likely until there is only one left. It is getting harder and harder to find alternatives as they get taken over – like Mozilla – or possibly always were started by them in the first place.
We must use what they create to build an alternate economy and make local connections while we can.
GrowMap would love you to read ..Local Food Idea a Finalist in $100,000 Program: What you can learn from this idea to grow your business
Twitter: brphollis
November 19, 2012 at 5:10 pm
Hi Robert,
I like that someone is really seeing past all the smoke and mirrors. That is exactly what this is about – a monopoly problem and it’s all about money. Period.
Bryan
Bryan P. Hollis would love you to read ..Specific Web Designs for Individual Needs
Twitter: GrowMap
November 21, 2012 at 11:40 am
Hi Bryan,
While money is the method, it is not the only goal. They already have almost all of the money – more than they could ever spend. What they want is control of EVERYTHING. Have you seen the videos quoting Rockefeller like this one >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERC3F_Q5WU8 ?
GrowMap would love you to read ..Blogging Collaborations and Best Practices
Twitter: DAMGFLORIDA
November 19, 2012 at 12:27 pm
I just saw on CNBC that Bing, Yahoo, and Facebook are going to work together to try and beat Google. I hope they do!!
Peter Charles would love you to read ..Will A Young Traffic Accident Victim’s Family Obtain Justice For His Death?
Twitter: GrowMap
November 19, 2012 at 4:21 pm
Hi Peter,
That sounds like the first step to merge Bing, Yahoo! and Facebook and then later they can more easily be merged with Google.
GrowMap would love you to read ..Deals or Duds? How to Save Big and Avoid Getting Burnt
As much as I would love to see Google get slapped, that kind of merger has got to get past the courts and hope that the new entity doesn’t become as troublesome as the old one. The cycle continues…
D. Dixon would love you to read ..Basic SEO Checklist: 7 Blog Traffic Tips To Keep In Mind
Google’s Algorithm is so twisted I’m not even sure it exists anymore! You really do start to wonder if all your SEO efforts are worth it. Like you, I’m no big fan of Microsoft either, but the Bing/Yahoo setup is a whole lot easier to work with.
← Previous Comments
Next Comments →